positivity core functionality #
This file sets up the positivity tactic and the @[positivity] attribute,
which allow for plugging in new positivity functionality around a positivity-based driver.
The actual behavior is in @[positivity]-tagged definitions in Tactic.Positivity.Basic
and elsewhere.
A definition of type PositivityExt tagged @[positivity t] extends the positivity tactic.
The term (with underscores) t indicates which expressions this extension accepts.
An extension will be given an expression e : α, together with hypotheses
[Zero α] [PartialOrder α] and attempts to prove e > 0, e ≥ 0, or e ≠ 0.
When Positivity.core calls this extension on an expression e, it does not guarantee that e
matches t perfectly: validate the form of the expression (using e.g.
match_expr (← withReducible (whnf e))) before building a proof. See also the
let .app ... ← withReducible (whnf e) | throwError ... lines in the example below.
An extension can call Mathlib.Meta.Positivity.core to recursively solve subgoals.
Example:
@[positivity ite _ _ _] def evalIte : PositivityExt where eval {u α} zα pα e := do
let .app (.app (.app (.app f (p : Q(Prop))) (_ : Q(Decidable $p))) (a : Q($α))) (b : Q($α))
← withReducible (whnf e) | throwError "not ite"
haveI' : $e =Q ite $p $a $b := ⟨⟩
guard <| ← withDefault <| withNewMCtxDepth <| isDefEq f q(ite (α := $α))
let ra ← core zα pα a; let rb ← core zα pα b
...
Instances For
The result of positivity running on an expression e of type α.
- positive {u : Lean.Level} {α : Q(Type u)} {zα : Q(Zero «$α»)} {pα : Q(PartialOrder «$α»)} {e : Q(«$α»)} (pf : Q(0 < «$e»)) : Strictness zα pα e
- nonnegative {u : Lean.Level} {α : Q(Type u)} {zα : Q(Zero «$α»)} {pα : Q(PartialOrder «$α»)} {e : Q(«$α»)} (pf : Q(0 ≤ «$e»)) : Strictness zα pα e
- nonzero {u : Lean.Level} {α : Q(Type u)} {zα : Q(Zero «$α»)} {pα : Q(PartialOrder «$α»)} {e : Q(«$α»)} (pf : Q(«$e» ≠ 0)) : Strictness zα pα e
- none {u : Lean.Level} {α : Q(Type u)} {zα : Q(Zero «$α»)} {pα : Q(PartialOrder «$α»)} {e : Q(«$α»)} : Strictness zα pα e
Instances For
Instances For
Gives a generic description of the positivity result.
Instances For
Extract a proof that e is positive, if possible, from Strictness information about e.
Instances For
Extract a proof that e is nonnegative, if possible, from Strictness information about e.
Instances For
Extract a proof that e is nonzero, if possible, from Strictness information about e.
Instances For
An extension for positivity.
- eval {u : Lean.Level} {α : Q(Type u)} (zα : Q(Zero «$α»)) (pα : Q(PartialOrder «$α»)) (e : Q(«$α»)) : Lean.MetaM (Strictness zα pα e)
Attempts to prove an expression
e : αis>0,≥0, or≠0.
Instances For
Read a positivity extension from a declaration of the right type.
Instances For
Each positivity extension is labelled with a collection of patterns
which determine the expressions to which it should be applied.
Instances For
Environment extensions for positivity declarations
Converts a MetaM Strictness which can fail
into one that never fails and returns .none instead.
Instances For
Converts a MetaM Strictness which can return .none
into one which never returns .none but fails instead.
Instances For
Attempts to prove a Strictness result when e evaluates to a literal number.
Instances For
Attempts to prove that e ≥ 0 using zero_le in a CanonicallyOrderedAdd monoid.
Instances For
A variation on assumption when the hypothesis is lo ≤ e where lo is a numeral.
Instances For
A variation on assumption when the hypothesis is lo < e where lo is a numeral.
Instances For
A variation on assumption when the hypothesis is x = e where x is a numeral.
Instances For
A variation on assumption which checks if the hypothesis ldecl is a [</≤/=] e
where a is a numeral.
Instances For
The main combinator which combines multiple positivity results.
It assumes t₁ has already been run for a result, and runs t₂ and takes the best result.
It will skip t₂ if t₁ is already a proof of .positive, and can also combine
.nonnegative and .nonzero to produce a .positive result.
Instances For
Run each registered positivity extension on an expression, returning a NormNum.Result.
Instances For
Given an expression e, use the core method of the positivity tactic to prove it positive,
or, failing that, nonnegative; return a Boolean (signalling whether the strict or non-strict
inequality was established) together with the proof as an expression.
Instances For
Given an expression e, use the core method of the positivity tactic to prove it nonnegative.
Instances For
An auxiliary entry point to the positivity tactic. Given a proposition t of the form
0 [≤/</≠] e, attempts to recurse on the structure of t to prove it. It returns a proof
or fails.
Instances For
The main entry point to the positivity tactic. Given a goal goal of the form 0 [≤/</≠] e,
attempts to recurse on the structure of e to prove the goal.
It will either close goal or fail.
Instances For
positivity solves goals of the form 0 ≤ x, 0 < x and x ≠ 0. The tactic works recursively
according to the syntax of the expression x, by attempting to prove subexpressions are
positive/nonnegative/nonzero and combining this into a final proof. This tactic either closes the
goal or fails.
For each subexpression e, positivity will try to:
- try
@[positivity]-tagged extensions to recursively proveeis positive/nonnegative/nonzero based on its subexpressions (see thepositivityattribute for more details), or - try the
norm_numtactic to proveeis positive/nonnegative/nonzero, or - try showing
e : tis nonnegative because there is aCanonicallyOrderedAdd tinstance, or - use a local hypothesis of the form
0 ≤ e,0 < eore ≠ 0.
This tactic is extensible. See the positivity attribute documentation for more details.
positivity [t₁, …, tₙ]first executeshave := t₁; …; have := tₙin the current goal, then runspositivity. This is useful whenpositivityneeds derived premises such as0 < yfor division/reciprocal, or0 ≤ xfor real powers.
Examples:
example {a : ℤ} (ha : 3 < a) : 0 ≤ a ^ 3 + a := by positivity
example {a : ℤ} (ha : 1 < a) : 0 < |(3:ℤ) + a| := by positivity
example {b : ℤ} : 0 ≤ max (-3) (b ^ 2) := by positivity
example {a b c d : ℝ} (hab : 0 < a * b) (hb : 0 ≤ b) (hcd : c < d) :
0 < a ^ c + 1 / (d - c) := by
positivity [sub_pos_of_lt hcd, pos_of_mul_pos_left hab hb]
Instances For
We set up positivity as a first-pass discharger for gcongr side goals.
We register positivity with the hint tactic.