Indexed sup / inf in conditionally complete lattices #
This file proves lemmas about iSup and iInf for functions valued in a conditionally complete
partial order, as opposed to a conditionally complete lattice.
TODO #
- Use
@[to_dual]in theGaloisConnectionandOrderIsosections.
The indexed suprema of two functions are comparable if the functions are pointwise comparable
The indexed infimum of two functions are comparable if the functions are pointwise comparable
Introduction rule to prove that b is the supremum of f: it suffices to check that b
is larger than f i for all i, and that this is not the case of any w<b.
See iSup_eq_of_forall_le_of_forall_lt_exists_gt for a version in complete lattices.
Introduction rule to prove that b is the infimum of f: it suffices to check that b
is smaller than f i for all i, and that this is not the case of any w>b.
See iInf_eq_of_forall_ge_of_forall_gt_exists_lt for a version in complete lattices.
Nested intervals lemma: if f is a monotone sequence, g is an antitone sequence, and
f n ≤ g n for all n, then ⨆ n, f n belongs to all the intervals [f n, g n].
Nested intervals lemma: if [f n, g n] is an antitone sequence of nonempty
closed intervals, then ⨆ n, f n belongs to all the intervals [f n, g n].